Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
_gat
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
90 days
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
Been looking at this for about 20 minutes now. Best thing I’ve seen in a long long time!
I LOVE the look, it feels documentary and accurate to the day!
Thanks Dan. Really appreciate it.
Just awesome nick. Proper photography! I can see your street work in these.
Thanks Mr Riley. Maybe I should start doing street photography again after all!
This is really fascinating and brave work. I love your comments about the ‘awkward and imperfect’
Thanks Simon. Semi brave. I did think ‘Jeez am I doing the right thing at points during the day.’ ;-)
Refreshing to see. Always looking. Good for you
Thanks Jez. Very much appreciated…
Fuck yeah yeah!
Thanks JB!
Hell yeah
*emoji thumbs up*
I don’t like them. Sorry. The party shots look ok but as it’s dark I would expect them to have flash. I think the others look a amateurish. As you said though some will like them and some won’t :-)
Hey man, don’t be sorry. I appreciate the conversation. But what I’m saying is ‘amateurish’ is kind of the point here. We can all take the high-end ‘professional’ shot. That’s easy. The problem with those is if they’re too professional, too polished, too slick, they can end up looking like glossy brochure images for cruise ships. So, given that, what does it mean to reject that aesthetic for something else? Awkward, imperfect, professional are all just modes of representation. So then why is there the tyranny of the flawless in wedding photography?
Bit rude that eh. Nick you’re not just a talented & ballsy photographer you’ve also got excellent manners.
Anna forgot to mention your boyish charm and devilish good looks
I noticed that too, Sam.
How dare you using flash direct on people?!
Don’t change ever! Hahaha awesome work!
X
Haha. Thanks Carine Xx
It’s definitely not for every client, but as a photographer I can appreciate that it’s a lot quicker to process than shooting natural light! You say it’s unflattering, but direct flash can make people look way better that the ugly lighting in a lot of venues or top-heavy daylight. Might try it on the next Vicar I have just to see the death-stare down the aisle.
I love this Nick. I appreciate it may not be to everyone’s taste but that’s the point for me – it doesn’t cater to the lowest common denominator. Great work.
Hey Nick
I can’t say I am a fan (of these images lol). I think that Mark has hit the nail on the head in that they do not separate you from some one that was a guest at the wedding picking up a point and shoot. Not to do you a disservice (as the style and especially composition might be reflective of how you shoot most of your wedding work) I took a look at some of your previous weddings and they are chalk and cheese. Could have been shot by two different photographers. I am not referring to the use of flash but moreover the way you have approached your general composition.
Take for example the wedding you shot in France (Les Trois Garcons Chateau).
A great set of images, many of them with beautiful light, considered composition and a real air of ‘professionalism’ about them. You look like you thought about each image as you made it.
Now compare them to your ‘experiment’ and I see a marked difference in your approach. If I am honest (and I am sure you would want me to be) they look more than a little lazy. You have not really worried about composition. You have just pointed the camera and shot. It sounds harsh to word it like this but that is my opinion when I compare these images to what I see as the ‘effort’ that you have put into your previous work. I can understand that they may have a certain appeal to some, and in fact there are a few that give me a 70’s nostalgic vibe…but I have to agree with Mark (Ashworth) that on the whole they do look pretty amateurish (which obviously you are not). It is not rude to say this. You asked for opinions and I have given you mine.
I am not against the use of flash. I use it myself plenty when needed. At the end of the day, as professionals, we all need to do the best job we can for the client. There is absolutely nothing wrong with trying to exceed the clients expectations ie. ‘Glossy,magazine style’ or whatever….as long as you meet their expectations one way or another. You obviously did with this couple and you had a bit of fun doing it.
What are your thoughts moving forward? Would you do it again? Would you change your style to market this approach. Or was it just that…an experiment…been there done that, sort of thing?
ROFL.
(That means ‘rolling on the floor laughing’ btw)
Pleased you were amused.
OOF Phil.
To throw the word lazy out there is a very bold statement, to insinuate that Nick maybe didn’t care enough about this couple to just lazily use such an important day to them as a “point and shoot” flash experiment is more than insulting and really quite patronising. That may be how you feel when you see them for some reason, but lazy they most definitely are not. You see the guts of this wedding and the relationships between this family and group of friends, something that could never be achieved with a lazy photographer. If anything even from reading the process that lead up to this decision it’s evident how much thought went into shooting this day.
I see you mentioned you yourself are a working professional, do you not adapt your approach and shooting style on a wedding by wedding basis? To shoot a French chateau wedding in this style wouldn’t really work at all, but neither would shooting in that classic style have worked for this wedding, and especially not this couple. Adapting to our subjects is the very soul of what we do, no?
I did feel like Nick was a guest at the wedding and for me personally that’s why I loved them. (And I’m not a flash fan in the slightest so was honestly not expecting to love them!) It wasn’t a show, nothing was put on, I went through them and immediately felt like I knew what it was like to be at their wedding. It dragged me back to growing up in the north east as a kid and going to family weddings and party’s. I could smell the hall and taste the buffet, hear the music, I was there and every time they look at these images they’re going to be right back there too, what a fucking gift.
The composition is deliberate and shot with intent to give you that feeling of being a guest (I feel anyway, not about to mansplain to Nick how he made his own work, think there’s been enough of that in some of these comments haha) but what separates these from an actual guest with a wind up camera to me is the emotion in them, they’re not just photos of people having fun, the shots of them listening to the speeches for example, they’re careful and considered, you can see he’s played the waiting game and then caught what an impact whatever is being said to them is having, and that’s what I’d want to see from my wedding photos. They aren’t up a mountain, they’re smoking outside an old hall, it’s involved and it’s real and you can feel radiating out of so many of these what an incredibly happy day they had, suits them perfectly.
I’m sorry, Phil but I think you and Mark both seem to have a strangely rigid and outdated view of what wedding photography should be. Even the fact that wedding photography SHOULD BE anything at all feels outdated. Photography is allowed to be scratchy and raw. Being a professional photographer is not about having the best camera on the block, it’s about what you bring to the day behind the camera. For me, as I was shooting this day I wasn’t thinking about other wedding photography at all. I was thinking of photographers like Lauren Greenfield, Richard Billingham, Nick Waplington, Ewan Spencer, because those were the touchstones for that wedding on that day. As Vikki-Kate said above, I didn’t shoot the Les Trois Garcons wedding in the same that because it was an entirely different wedding and to shoot it like that would have been entirely wrong. It’s about steeping yourself in all forms of photography and then being able to react with honesty and authenticity to the day and the people in front of you. I want to connect to the people I’m photographing and I want people looking at the photos to connect to them through those shots. And that’s really everything for me. The rest is just personal taste. Which I feel no need to be prescriptive about.
Really enjoyed this, Nick! Such a unique style and it’s refreshing to see someone unafraid to challenge convention, growing as an artist in the process. Sure, it won’t appeal to everyone but who wants to be generic, eh? Well done.
I love the set!!
I love that this style is unapologetically swimming against the tide and I don’t know of any other photographer that could have pulled it off with such panache as your good self! I think it’s both visually interesting and stimulating in equal measures.
Even [as a photographer] if this isn’t for you or your own style, you’d have to be a relic from the past; probably wheeling out the same repertoire over the last 20years, living in an echo chamber of like minded dinosaurs to think ‘your way is the only way’ to not see it for what it is….
A collaborative adventure between the couple and photographer to create a unique body of work.
Bravo Nick!
I was fully expecting to wince at these being a woman terrified of her flash (I don’t even know what model mine is, it’s black? ha!) but I actually loved them.
I had a proper visceral reaction to them, I was immediately a kid again at a family wedding, smelling tasting hearing everything that was going on, right up to going round to theirs for a tea in the morning still in pyjamas to talk about what a good time we all had. I was immediately emotionally invested in them as a couple and the more I saw them having an amazing time as the day went on, the happier I was looking at them.
No they’re not polished and fancy, but they’re full of love and take you straight there and honestly isn’t that what we all really need from our wedding photos? To be reminded of the emotion, not the nice hillside that was 10 minutes away.
Would love to see you get asked to do some more of this, you did them proud :)
As a guest at the wedding in question here, these photographs capture EXACTLY the spirit of the event. Very smart. Not in the least bit lazy. Very instantly cleverly composed and considered. Most importantly- and it matters not one jot what anyone else thinks – ‘professional’ as they may be – precisely what Maxie & Bridget wanted.
(And I love the ones of Me!) (lol)
Hey Mark. Really appreciate you writing, and great to get a guest’s perspective. I’m really glad you feel that way. And very happy you love the ones of you. I wasn’t sure who I should feature most prominently, you or Maxie and Bridget. In the end I went with Maxie and Bridget but it was a close run thing.. ;-)